Eugenics and the Myth of ‘Overpopulation’

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World.” Dr. Henry Kissinger.

According to Wikipedia… “Eugenics is the applied science or the biosocial movement which advocates the use of practices aimed at improving the genetic composition of a population.”

My definition would be… “Eugenics is the pseudo-science used as a cover by the Elite to facilitate the mass de-population of humanity in accordance with their stated goals.”

“What most Americans don’t realize is that the upper echelons of the United States government is no longer a government ‘of, by and for’ the people. The United States government as with all other major governments of the world is under the total domination and control of the Illuminati (architects of the so-called New World Order). The Illuminati’s plan to reduce the global population by 4 billion people before the year 2050 was laid out in the Global 2000 report assembled by the Carter administration in the late 70’s.” Ken Adachi, researcher,

How often do we hear the oft-repeated mantra of reduction of population being essential if we are to save the planet? The Global Warmists are forever telling us that man-made CO2 emissions are the cause of Global Warming (now euphemistically re-named Climate Change as it has become obvious that the Earth is actually cooling) and thus population needs to be reduced to eliminate this effect. This is all absolutely blatant eugenicist propaganda on behalf of the Elite I am afraid and eugenics is just a racist tool to justify genocide.

Consider this; the world population at the time of writing is approximately 7 billion – expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050 if current trends continue. It sounds huge and unsustainable does it not?

However, would you be surprised if I told you that the entire current population of the world (June 2016) could fit quite comfortably into an area the size of the US State of Texas at a density of less than 40 people per acre? Most modern housing developments can comfortably fit housing for around 100 people into a one acre development providing larger than average plots and without excessive overcrowding and an apartment tower block can contain as many as one thousand people in a ground area considerably smaller than one acre. Approximately 16,000 people live and work in the Willis (formerly Sears) Tower in Chicago, the tallest building on the American continent, which has a ‘footprint’ of just over one acre, at 225 by 225 feet. However this fact is simply by way of an illustration of the point. I am certainly not advocating tower blocks, let alone one the size of the Willis Tower as an answer to the so-called, non-existent over-population ‘problem’.

If the Elite wished to do so, they could easily divert some tiny percentage of the vast amounts of money spent on their constant conflicts and wars to further their corporate ambitions and a miniscule amount of the obscene profits from their usury and solve the world housing and food shortages virtually overnight, thus eliminating poverty forever. That they choose not to, speaks volumes about their motives and motivations to me. ‘Overpopulation’ of certain areas of the world is a symptom of poverty, ignorance and want and not the cause. If all people were treated as valuable human beings instead of as ‘useless eaters’ by the tiny minority pulling the world’s strings then we would all be educated by society, our parents and peers from birth to understand co-operation and working together as a species and thus overpopulation and poverty would instantly become an non-issue.

I have to tell you that the world food and water shortage we are constantly reminded of by the compliant media is entirely engineered and managed, to further our rulers’ stated goal of population reduction and secondarily to inflate food prices even further as a means of control. Food production and distribution is slowly being concentrated into the remit of fewer and fewer organisations through such devices as Codex Alimentarius and the recent US Food Safety legislation S510, in order to facilitate its scarcity and thus control the size, spread and composition of human populations worldwide.

Through corrupt, evil corporations such as Monsanto, we are seeing the introduction of Genetically Modified (GM) foods, calculated to contaminate and disrupt the food chain as well as maximise their profits by in effect ‘cornering the market’ on certain foodstuffs that have in effect become Monsanto’s own genetic property, contrary maybe not to their laws but certainly to human morality and ethics.

In the late 18th century an Anglican priest named Thomas Malthus demonstrated with ‘mathematical certainty’ that the world was heading toward demographic disaster. After all, human population increases exponentially while food supply increases arithmetically, does it not? From this it logically follows that it is only a matter of time before the world population outstrips our ability to feed ourselves. Or does it?

Using the same logic, a parent might well view his child’s first year of growth and extrapolate that he will be 25 feet tall by the time he is 40 years old, but more than 200 years of the expected population crisis failing to arrive has demonstrated that there are fundamental flaws in Malthus’ reasoning. The earth is not a zero-sum game and human ingenuity has always and in every generation somehow managed to expand the available resources even as we take larger and larger portions of our seemingly finite resources. Now even the despicable United Nations’ most alarmist predictions admit that global population will level-out and even begin declining by 2050. Malthus is now well understood to have been a complete fraudster propounding his fairy tales for the benefit of the corrupt, Elite-run British East India Company that employed him.

Incredibly though, despite every one of the doomsday predictions of Malthus and his adherents proving to be false, decade after decade for more than two centuries, Malthus’ ideas are still being taken seriously or at least we are told that they are taken seriously and are still being hyped and promoted by the Elite oligarchs who benefit from the idea that there are too many ‘useless eaters’ using up the world’s resources.

Malthus himself, an Anglican minister, wrote that “We are bound in justice and honour formally to disdain the right of the poor to support,” arguing for a law making it illegal for the Anglican Church to give any food, clothing or support to any children. How very Christian in its sentiment. Not content with consigning thousands of children to death for the misfortune of being born poor however, Malthus also advocated actively contributing to the deaths of more of the poor through social-engineering.

“Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlement in all marshy and unwholesome situations. But above all we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases and restrain those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they are doing a service to mankind by protecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders.” Thomas Malthus, Anglican Priest

This in itself, succinctly tells us all we need to know about the motives of the hierarchy of mainstream religion, in my view. The horrific nature of this idea is made all the more preposterous by the fact that Malthus was encouraging the spread of disease and plague in order to ‘save’ humanity from the diseases and plagues that overpopulation fosters. But this self-contradiction is completely lost on those whose bloodlust drives them to support such drastic population reduction schemes in their vile scheming to exterminate the poor and downtrodden of society.

As repulsive as Malthus’ ideas are in our more ‘enlightened times’, they have provided an ideological framework for those with a psychopathic urge to dominate others for the past two hundred years.

In his infamous 1968 book, ‘The Population Bomb’, Paul Ehrlich and his wife Anne wrote…

“A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people…We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.”

Ehrlich felt that the blight of new-born babies was so potentially devastating to humanity that in 1969 he actually advocated adding sterilisers to the food and water supply. Lest there were any doubt about his remarks, he further elaborated on them in ‘Ecoscience’, a 1977 book that he co-authored with Barack Obama’s science Czar, John Holdren, in which they once again advocated adding sterilising agents to the water supply.

In 1972, ex-World Bank advisor and UN functionary Maurice Strong advocated government licencing for a woman’s right to have children and in 1988, Prince Philip uttered his deplorable comment “In the event I am reborn, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” However Prince Philip knows very well that one day he will be re-born as are we all, fortunately for him not as a deadly virus, but one would sincerely hope as a poor, starving peasant in a remote village somewhere in the third world. That would really be karma in action.

In the 1990s, Ted Turner told ‘Audubon’ magazine that “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95 percent decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

Of course, the overpopulation myth itself crumbles under the slightest scrutiny. No one, not even the UN, is projecting limitless growth of the human population. Even the most alarmist projections show the world population levelling off within 40 years. Significantly, the birth rate in every major industrialised nation in the world is now below the replacement level of 2.01, meaning that they are all in fact dying nations of aging populations that require an ever-increasing influx of immigrants just to maintain their population levels. In addition to the well-known phenomenon of industrialisation reducing the sizes of families, there are now indications that chemicals called endocrine disruptors which are mysteriously (or perhaps not so mysteriously) ending up in our foods, plastics and drinking water are limiting our biological ability to reproduce, with sperm rates among Western men declining by a staggering 50% in the last 50 years with 85% of the remaining sperm being abnormal.

But still, even if we were to take the hysteria about population size at face value, the ‘solutions’ suggested by the Malthusians – forced sterilisation programmes, de-industrialisation, and even genocide – represent the biggest fraud of all; the idea that merely reducing the size of a population will somehow reduce the inequalities and iniquities within that society.

But therein lies the secret. The people who are seen to ‘worry’ the most over the overpopulation non-problem cannot be reasoned-with because their concern for humanity is only pretence. The way they approach the problem itself clearly exhibits their bias in the matter. Most reasonable people see an increase in the number of people on the planet not as a scourge, but as an opportunity to increase our understanding of the human species and its capabilities. In the twisted vision of the overpopulation fearmongers however, new-born babies are not a joy to behold, not a gift, not the living, breathing potential of the future of the human race, but a cancer on the Earth that must be destroyed at all costs.

The Elite are not interested in increasing food production, lifting the poor out of poverty or developing technology to increase our ability to share in the abundant wealth of the world. Instead they wish for the forcible sterilisation of the poor, the consignment of billions around the world to grinding poverty and the elimination of vast swathes of the population. They do not wish to reduce the pain and suffering in the world, but to increase it. In short, the overpopulation hysteria is a convenient lie for the ruthless Elite who stand to benefit from the panic they themselves cause.

Bill Gates (of Microsoft fame – or should that be infamy) and Warren Buffett are major funders of global population reduction programmes, as is Ted Turner, whose UN Foundation was created to funnel $1 billion of his tax-free stock option earnings in AOL-Time-Warner into various birth reduction programmes in the developing world. The programmes in Africa and elsewhere are masked as philanthropy and providing health services for poor Africans. In reality they involve involuntary population sterilisation via vaccination and other medicines that make women of child-bearing age infertile, without their express consent.

The Gates Foundation, where Buffett deposited the bulk of his wealth several years ago, is also backing the introduction of GMO seeds into Africa under the cloak of the Kofi Annan-led ‘Second Green Revolution’ in Africa. The introduction of GMO patented seeds in Africa to date has met with enormous indigenous resistance. The introduction of this abomination into India over a decade ago has resulted in the suicide, so far, of over 250,000 farmers at a conservative estimate (see Health section for full details).

Health experts point out that were the intent of Gates really to improve the health and well-being of black Africans, the same hundreds of millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in untested and unsafe vaccines could be used in providing minimal sanitary water and sewage systems. Vaccinating a child who then drinks sewage-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning-up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionise the health conditions of that continent and save thousands of lives.   How undesirable would that be to these monsters masquerading as human?

Gates’ comments in 2010 about devising new vaccines to reduce global population were obviously not a simple off-the-cuff remark or error. For those who doubt this fact, the presentation Gates made at the TED2009 annual gathering said almost exactly the same thing about reducing population to cut global warming.

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion.  Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.” Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft and avid Eugenicist, 2010

This statement, when examined, says two things to me. Firstly it says that he strongly advocates population reduction, but perhaps even more chillingly it openly admits that vaccinations really do kill people!  How much more proof do we need than this that we are not just under physical attack by these people, but also under psychological attack in the form of pro-vaccination propaganda?